Rational vs. Non-Rational Propaganda

17 Nov

Westerners usually refer to Chinese media as “communist/socialist propaganda”, or simply “propaganda”; similar thing for Nazi Germany.  This had led me to believe that “propaganda” is a really bad word — just like the notion that “revolution” is a really good word. Now in US with the Right vs. Left media war more fierce than ever  and two parties pointing fingers to each other and saying “this is just propaganda!”,  it is both illuminating AND confusing about the true meaning of the word.

I came across this post by Mark Cassello the other day, which in my opinion serves as a great textbook material in civic education on the subject:

In Propaganda in a Democratic Society (1958), Aldous Huxley differentiates two forms of propaganda. The first, which he lauds, is called “rational propaganda.” This type of propaganda agrees with the “enlightened self-interest of those who make it and those to whom it is addressed.” In other words, the purveyors of and the recipients of both stand to benefit from the dissemination of this propaganda.

The second, called “non-rational propaganda,” is not necessarily aligned with anyone’s “enlightened self-interest,” but is instead “dictated by, and appeals to, passion.” The former, he argues, is vital to a democratic society that serves the long-term interests of all while the latter creates a world filled with “misery” in which people, moved by passion more than reason, are driven to act against their own self-interest.

Then Cassello went on offering his take on how the Right’s “non-rational propaganda” has come into dominance in the past 30 years, by establishing “fabricated foes” and manipulating the audiences’ fear and “desire to protect themselves and their families from some form of ‘violation'”. Finally he gave some advice for Democrats and the like on how to learn new, if they have any, media skills to make their “rational propaganda” feel as good as that of their opponents, for those, if I may say, less-enlightened people.

In some sense, I think this is essentially the point Bill Maher was trying to make in his criticism of Jon Stewart and Stephen Colbert’s Rally early this month, all of whom I love, in that you really can’t win the battle in a noble way against a “dirty player”. Human nature tries to settle for one of two extremes and avoid the complicated in-betweens, and that’s the Right’s best game, even if it’s something as surreal and preposterous as Glenn Beck (see 10 Funniest Videos Mocking Glenn Beck).

Advertisements

3 Responses to “Rational vs. Non-Rational Propaganda”

  1. shjwysjj November 17, 2010 at 11:20 pm #

    I just don’t understand why some people will believe stuff like “there is no climate change. Because carbon dioxide is a safe gas ambient in the atmosphere.”

    I hope making people better-educated will let Democrats act less dirty to defend truth.

    • Jason Tillmann November 2, 2015 at 3:29 am #

      It is all propaganda. The ultimate point of Aldous Huxley in the book is one type of propaganda is designed to help all or both sides and one type only a minority and is supported by the majority through playing with someone emotions. There is much non-rational propaganda with Republicans and Democrats who both comprise, not to benefit the people but to benefit themselves, a small rich and powerful minority.

      The small book of nonfiction is called ‘Brave New World Revisited’ (1958) by Aldous Huxley and the chapter is called ‘Propaganda in a Democratic Society’ however the complete book is a great propaganda for critical thinking concerning the ideas of human freedom. I prefer freedom.

    • Jason Tillmann November 2, 2015 at 3:45 am #

      Government is a big part of the problem in environmental issues because money is not needed to help our home be a healthier place. Nobody is denying climate change. The debate is with the theory of human contribution to climate change and if the guilt of ruining the planet can make a profit through legislative means. The climate change debate could easily be an example of non-rational propaganda in our modern times.

      If leaders and people were really concerned about the human effects on climate change, the only logical and reasonable solutions take personal sacrifice from all individuals towards a much healthier world to live in. All legislative solutions give us is more spending of money with more Government control over everyone, guilty or not. This type of non-rational propaganda is not going to help anyone’s environment.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

w

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: